Learn the LNAT.

Develop an eye for

Join the waitlist

Lesson 01Reading

Main argument

1.1 · The claim the rest are there to serve

Sentence 1

Australia introduced compulsory voting in 1924.

supports

Sentence 2

The mistake is calling that “illiberal” — what compulsion enforces is turnout, not a choice of party.

supports

Sentence 3

Turnout has held above 90 per cent for decades.

Why

Two of these only set up or back the claim. The main argument is the one they serve — here the second sentence, not the first.

Lesson 02Reading

Assertion vs. report

2.1 · What the author owns

One sentence reports a view; the next commits to one.

Reported

view A

Critics of the reform argue that it punishes the prudent.

Asserted

view B

But prudence, here, is indistinguishable from luck.

The tell

Argue attributes the claim to critics — reported, not owned. The second has no reporting verb: the author states it flatly, and so must defend it.

Lesson 04Reading

Comparison

4.1 · Where two views actually part

View A

Holds that

punishment must express society's censure.

Treats censure as

the core of just punishment.

Concedes that

deterrence matters at the margin.

View B

Holds that

punishment is justified by deterrence alone.

Treats censure as

a useful side-effect, no more.

Concedes that

censure is rhetorically useful.

Point of divergence

whether censure is intrinsic to punishment, or merely instrumental.

Lesson 05Structure

Rhetorical purpose

5.1 · Why the sentence is there

One paragraph, four sentences — each does a different job.

1Jury trial is often criticised for its delay.Sets up

2It is true that lay deliberation can slow proceedings.Concedes

3But speed is not the measure of justice.Counters

4A slower verdict may still be a truer one.Concludes

the move the question is testing

Why

Sentence 3 is the turn — its “but” pivots the paragraph; the others set it up or carry it home.

Lesson 06Reading

Language and tone

6.1 · The words that carry attitude

Same fact, two words of attitude — tap each to weigh it.

The minister conceded — grudgingly — that the review had merit.

Connotes

↑ conceded

yielding under pressure — agreement extracted, not offered.

Connotes

↑ grudgingly

the author's distance — reluctance the minister would not admit.

Tap a word to read what it carries

Tone stripped“The minister agreed the review had merit.” — same fact, no attitude.

Net readThe author reports the minister’s agreement — while signalling they don’t share his reluctance.

Lesson 07Reasoning

Applied reasoning

7.1 · Carrying a rule to a new case

Principle

from the passage

Liability requires foreseeable harm.

New case

A pharmacist sells a common drug; a rare allergy kills the buyer.

Does the principle apply?

✓Liable

✗Not liable

the harm was not foreseeable to the seller, so the condition fails.

Lesson 08Reasoning

Critical evaluation

8.1 · Finding the load-bearing weak step

1Premise

Sentencing should reflect culpability.

2Premise

Culpability depends on intent.

3Premise

Intent can be read off the outcome.

Conclusion

Therefore sentencing should track outcome.

Weak step

Outcome is evidence of intent, not a substitute for it.

Twelve LNATs before the real one.

Each mock runs on a copy of the Pearson VUE interface — same screen, same timer, same scoring as the real LNAT. By exam day the only new thing is the questions.

National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) - Sample Test

◷ Time Remaining 94:38▤ Question 5 of 42

Passage 1 of 12⚑ Flag for Review

Passage 5 · The transport bill

Critics of the new transport bill argue that the proposed congestion charge will harm working-class commuters disproportionately. But the data behind that claim is drawn from a single survey conducted three years before the bill was drafted, when commuting patterns and household income distributions looked materially different.

Question 5 of 42

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the critics’ argument?

A.The single survey accurately captured commuting patterns at the time it was conducted.

B.Comparable bills in other cities relied on similarly limited survey evidence.

C.Commuting habits in the borough have shifted substantially since the survey.

D.Working-class commuters are not the demographic most affected by congestion charges in general.

E.The author of the survey has since withdrawn the central conclusions.

Section A · Reading

End Section◁ PreviousNext ▷

Six modules. One clear path.

From the first lesson on prepping to the last article on the morning of the exam — every step you'd want a tutor to walk you through, laid out by section.

Foundations

0 of 5 lessons completed · About 28 minutes total

Expand all

Get started

Begin here · about 17 minutes total

START HEREPlan your prep

6 min

What's on the LNAT

5 min

How to revise

6 min

Mindset & habits

About 11 minutes left in module

Drill by question typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topic.

Necessary assumption, parallel reasoning, author's purpose — each isolated as its own queue.

Highest

Drawing controlled inferences

22 questions~14 min

Start drill

Highest

Main argument

18 questions~12 min

Start drill

High

Rhetorical purpose

14 questions~12 min

Start drill

High

Tracking comparisons

18 questions~13 min

Start drill

Plan before you write.

Plan a position, stress-test the counterargument, then draft against a clear structure.

Section B · prompt 04Draft 2 · 412 words

“Voting in democratic elections should be compulsory.” Discuss.

Compulsory voting is often dismissed as illiberal, but the charge misreads what compulsion does — it requires turnout, not a choice of party.The Australian system since 1924 shows that a no-confidence box keeps the ballot voluntary in substance while… |

40:00 plan · 22:14 leftthesis ✓counter ✓example –

Next drillCounterargument · 20m →

Keep the mistakes in view.

Every wrong answer becomes something to revisit — the type, the reason, the next drill.

68%

Accuracy

Weakest tags

Necessary assumption

42%

Inference — strength

54%

Rhetorical purpose

71%

Drill the bottom three →

Progress, plainly reported.

Accuracy, timing, mock bands, essay feedback, and weak spots — gathered in one plain report.

Predicted band

1W1M3MAll

31/42

Current

34/42

Target

Next focus

Counterargument

Lowest band in last three essays.

▲ +9 in 6 weeks

Pick a plan.

Start free. Cancel any time.

Plans

Free gives you the sample set. Basic covers the full cycle. Pro adds essay feedback and human grading.

Free

£0no card needed

Join waitlist

Basic

£29/ year

Join waitlist

ProBest value

£59/ year

Join waitlist

01VolumeHow much practice material you get.

Full-length practice tests

Lessons – Section A

Lessons – Section B

—

Question bank

100+

400+

1000+

02PracticeEssay tooling and feedback loops.

Answer explanations

—

Essay guidance

—

core

comprehensive

Adaptive difficulty

—

AI essay feedback

—

limited

increased

Human-graded essays

—

4 included

03ReviewSee what you got wrong and why.

Mistake stack

—

standard

+ Analytics

Predicted band

—

standard

+ Breakdown

Progress reports

—

standard

Full Version

Per-question analytics

—

Learn the LNAT.

Twelve LNATs before the real one.

Six modules. One clear path.

Foundations

Drill by question typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topic.

Plan before you write.

Keep the mistakes in view.

Progress, plainly reported.

Pick a plan.

Drill by question typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topicquestion typepassage genredifficultyessay topic.