The Cambridge Law Guide

Four chapters, built from primary admissions data.

Cambridge Law, in numbers.

Eleven cycles of Cambridge Law admissions, with the figures taken from the University's own releases.

Cambridge Law
OVERVIEW
2025 cycle

Headline numbers

Cambridge received 1,604 applications and made 232 offers for the 2025 admissions cycle (entry 2026)[1], an offer rate of 14.0%. 291 applicants were given a place under the standard offer (M0), with the remaining gap explained by withdrawals, declined offers, and pool releases.[1]

1,604APPLICATIONS291PLACES OFFERED232ADMITTED
14.0% ADMIT RATE
2025 ADMIT RATE
Applicants per place
7.13
1,604 applications for 232 admitted students in the 2025 cycle [1]
Home share of applicants
69.9%
1,156 home / 498 international in 2025 [2]
Colleges teaching Law
29
29 colleges admitted Law students in the 2025 cycle [3]

Three numbers worth fixing in your head

14% Headline admit rate

232 admits across 1,604 applicants in the 2025 cycle. [1] Roughly 1-in-7. Sits a couple of points above Oxford’s ~12%.

Oversubscription

Cambridge Law receives roughly 7 applications for every place it fills. Higher in the post-2020 spike (2021 = 7.6×), lower in 2017 (5.3×).

17.6% Offer rate (M1)

291 standard offers made on 1,604 applications.[1] The offer rate (pre-attrition) is higher than the admit rate because some offer-holders miss their grades or decline.

The Cambridge Law funnel

Every cycle from 2015 to 2025 in one frame.[1] Applications climbed from ~1,015 (2015) to a 2021 peak of 1,870, before settling at ~1,600-1,700. Offers and admits have stayed in a tight 240-290 band because capacity is set by college tutorial slots, not by demand.

Figure 1 · Eleven-cycle funnel

Applications Offers (M1) Admitted (M2)

Applications, offers, admitted

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2015 Apps: 1015 1015 2015 Offers: 257 257 2015 Admitted: 208 208 2015 2016 Apps: 1048 1048 2016 Offers: 256 256 2016 Admitted: 217 217 2016 2017 Apps: 1161 1161 2017 Offers: 275 275 2017 Admitted: 219 219 2017 2018 Apps: 1357 1357 2018 Offers: 269 269 2018 Admitted: 202 202 2018 2019 Apps: 1498 1498 2019 Offers: 292 292 2019 Admitted: 221 221 2019 2020 Apps: 1537 1537 2020 Offers: 287 287 2020 Admitted: 262 262 2020 2021 Apps: 1870 1870 2021 Offers: 265 265 2021 Admitted: 246 246 2021 2022 Apps: 1845 1845 2022 Offers: 245 245 2022 Admitted: 217 217 2022 2023 Apps: 1580 1580 2023 Offers: 280 280 2023 Admitted: 230 230 2023 2024 Apps: 1604 1604 2024 Offers: 288 288 2024 Admitted: 236 236 2024 2025 Apps: 1654 1654 2025 Offers: 291 291 2025 Admitted: 232 232 2025 Applications Offers Admitted
Cambridge Undergraduate Admissions Statistics, year totals 2015-2025 [1].
Cycle Apps Offers (M1) Admitted (M2) Offer rate Admit rate Apps/place
20151,01525720825.3%20.5%4.88
20161,04825621724.4%20.7%4.83
20171,16127521923.7%18.9%5.30
20181,35726920219.8%14.9%6.72
20191,49829222119.5%14.8%6.78
20201,53728726218.7%17.0%5.87
20211,87026524614.2%13.2%7.60
20221,84524521713.3%11.8%8.50
20231,58028023017.7%14.6%6.87
20241,60428823618.0%14.7%6.80
20251,60429123217.6%14.0%7.13

What the trend reveals

  • Applications grew 63% between 2015 and 2025. From 1,015 in 2015 to a 2021 peak of 1,870, settling at 1,604 in 2025. [1]
  • Offers held a tight 245-292 band. College tutorial slots cap capacity.
  • Admit rate compressed from 20.5% (2015) to 14.0% (2025). The course got harder to get into because the applicant pool grew, not because the course changed.
  • 2020-21 pandemic spike. Applications jumped from 1,537 to 1,870 in one cycle. The bulge has since unwound but baseline demand sits ~600 above 2015.

How Cambridge picks its 232

Cambridge does not use Oxford’s 80/10/10 weighting. The LNAT (where used) sits alongside two interviews, GCSEs and A-Level predictions in a college-by-college process.

Home vs international applicants

In 2025, 1,156 home and 498 international applicants applied for Cambridge Law.[2] The home share has hovered between 45% (2015) and 70% (2025), international demand rose sharply post-2018 then partially retreated.

Cycle Home apps Intl apps Home offers Intl offers Home offer rate Intl offer rate
201545356214611132.2%19.8%
201647757115010631.4%18.6%
201759756415012525.1%22.2%
201874761016610322.2%16.9%
20199325662029021.7%15.9%
20209935442087920.9%14.5%
20211,1866841877815.8%11.4%
20221,2446011687713.5%12.8%
20231,1044761958517.7%17.9%
20241,1084961959317.6%18.8%
20251,1564981999217.2%18.5%

Two patterns worth flagging

Pattern 1, the home share has flipped. In 2015, home applicants slightly outnumbered international (453 vs 562, i.e. home 45%); by 2022 home had risen to 1,244 vs 601 (home 68%); 2025 sits at 70% home.[2] Brexit, fee-status changes, and the post-pandemic spike in domestic applications all contribute.

Pattern 2, international offer rates are lower. Home offer rates have hovered 16-19% across the window; international offer rates have drifted from 19.7% (2015) down to ~15-18%. The international pool is smaller but also more self-selected, and Cambridge has not significantly grown the international intake.

For international applicants. The headline 14% admit rate hides a slightly tighter funnel, but the international pool is itself more self-selected, so the candidate-quality bar at the margin is similar. What decides offers across both pools is interview and LNAT performance, not where you applied from.

Per-college applicant load

Cambridge’s 29 Law-teaching colleges receive very different volumes of applications. In 2025, Downing led with 149 applications, Churchill received 28.[3] The pool system reallocates strong applicants rejected by one college to another, so college choice matters less than the raw numbers suggest.

College Apps Offers Admitted Offer rate
Downing149151110.1%
Gonville and Caius118161513.6%
Clare8210912.2%
Trinity79151119.0%
Jesus749712.2%
St John's74111014.9%
Corpus Christi679913.4%
Hughes Hall6711716.4%
Selwyn619614.8%
Queens'6010816.7%
Lucy Cavendish59141123.7%
St Catharine's559916.4%
Christ's5410918.5%
Homerton53131024.5%
King's51559.8%
Girton4911922.4%
Newnham498616.3%
Pembroke4710721.3%
Trinity Hall4610721.7%
St Edmund's4510622.2%
Magdalene4410722.7%
Peterhouse437716.3%
Emmanuel415512.2%
Fitzwilliam357520.0%
Wolfson3411932.4%
Robinson338724.2%
Murray Edwards2910834.5%
Churchill288528.6%
Sidney Sussex2810735.7%

The college economics

Three patterns in the per-college data. First, Downing, Trinity, Gonville & Caius, and Clare consistently attract the heaviest application loads, driven by historic Law reputation, Trinity’s endowment effect, and visibility. Second, mature-student colleges (Hughes Hall, Lucy Cavendish, Wolfson, St Edmund’s) admit a different cohort and run on a different competitive logic. Third, offer rates per college vary widely (5-25%) because the small numbers are noisy; within ±2 standard errors of one another, most colleges face the same effective bar.

The Cambridge pool absorbs most of the variation. If your college rejects you but ranks you above a candidate held elsewhere, you can be pooled and offered a place at a different college. In 2024-25 around 20-25% of all Cambridge offers come via the pool, though Law-specific pool figures are not separately published. [DATA GAP: Cambridge does not publish Law-specific pool conversion rate.]

Sources cited on this page

Every numerical claim above ends in a [n] superscript that links here. Click any link to open the primary report or dataset from which the figure was retrieved.

  1. [1]
    University of Cambridge: Undergraduate Admissions Statistics (Law totals 2015-2025) REPORT

    Annual undergraduate admissions statistics. Per-year applications, offers (M1), and admits (M2) for the Law course, 2015 through 2025.

  2. [2]
    University of Cambridge: Home vs international applicant split, Law, 2015-2025 REPORT

    Annual breakdown of home vs non-UK applicants, offers, and admits for Law.

  3. [3]
    University of Cambridge: Per-college Law applications, 2015-2025 REPORT

    Per-college applications, offers, and admits for Law across the eleven-cycle window.

Continue reading

Explore key trends and deeper insights from the data.