Your Section A score is one of the clearest predictors of an Oxford offer. This chapter shows you how applicants and offer holders scored, how the offer rate rises with your score, and how Oxford marks the essay.
Your Section A score is one of the clearest predictors of an Oxford offer. This chapter shows you how applicants and offer holders scored, how the offer rate rises with your score, and how Oxford marks the essay.
Jurica Research
Law admissions data · 2027 entry
Oxford Law
LNAT
Put what you’ve read into practice with a free diagnostic test and a full LNAT mock exam.
The LNAT gives Oxford two scores: your Section A (multiple-choice) mark out of 42, and your Section B essay, which Oxford marks itself. In the 2025-26 round (for 2026 entry) the two scores counted equally, and together they made up 20% of the shortlisting rank for candidates with a contextualised GCSE (cGCSE) score. Candidates without a cGCSE score were ranked on the two LNAT scores alone, and decisions made on that rank were then adjusted individually in the light of their school qualifications. The weighting for 2027 entry has not been published.[12]
Having said that, a figure of 20% understates how much the LNAT matters in practice. As you will see below, offer rates rise steeply with the Section A score, so a strong LNAT remains one of the most effective ways to improve your chances.
All applicants' Section A average
24.94
across all 2,115 candidates in the 2025-26 round [12]
Offer holders' Section A average
30.48
5.5 marks higher than the average for all candidates [12]
Section A has 12 passages with three or four questions each, 42 questions in all, and you have 95 minutes to answer them. You score one mark for each correct answer and nothing is deducted for a wrong one, so you should never leave a question blank.[17]
To see where you stand, it helps to look at how real applicants scored. In reply to an FOI request, Oxford released the scores of 1,814 applicants to Law (M100) for 2025 entry, of whom 1,767 had a Section A score.[1] (This is the round before the 2025-26 averages above.) The chart below shows how many applicants received each score, with offer holders in blue.
Section A scores, 2025 entry
Many candidates are surprised by how low the typical score is. The most common score was 26 (110 applicants), closely followed by 28 (109) and 23 (107), and the median was 25.[1] If your practice scores are in the mid-20s, then, you are in the middle of the field. Note, however, that the middle of the field is well below the offer-holder average of 30.92, and that candidates scoring below 18 (252 of the 1,767) almost never received an offer: only one of them did.
Offers, on the other hand, are concentrated between 28 and 35, and the most common score among offer holders was 31 (26 offers). Above 35 the number of offers falls, but only because so few candidates score that high: just 68 applicants scored 35 or more.[1]
Two further FOI releases help you set a target. For the same cycle, half of all offer holders scored between 28 and 34 on Section A (median 31), and half scored between 63 and 67 on the essay (median 65).[25] Offer-holder averages also vary between colleges: in the 2026 cycle, the college averages ranged from about 27.6 to 32.4.[26] In general, therefore, we recommend aiming for at least 30. A score of 34 or more would put you in the top quarter of offer holders.
Earlier cycles were similar. All applicants averaged 22.75 on Section A in the 2022 cycle and 24.32 in 2023, and offer holders averaged 28.34 in 2022 and 30.06 in 2023.[30][29][31]
How does the offer rate rise with your score?
The next chart shows the same 2025-entry data in a different way: for each Section A score, the percentage of applicants who received an offer.[1] We have left out scores with fewer than six applicants, because a single offer would distort the picture.
Offer rate at each Section A score, 2025 entry
Section A score
Applicants
Offers
Offer rate
0-14
113
0
0.0%
15-17
139
1
0.72%
18-20
231
4
1.73%
21-23
277
5
1.81%
24-26
293
25
8.53%
27-29
307
45
14.66%
30-32
233
62
26.61%
33-35
141
70
49.65%
36-41
33
23
69.7%
There are three things to notice here:
Below 24, the offer rate stays at 1-2%, so marks gained in this range make little difference on their own.
Between 24 and 30, the rate rises steadily, from about 5% to about 18%.
From around 30 upwards, it rises much faster: about 22% for scores of 29 to 31, 39% for 32 to 34 and 66% for 35 and above.[1]
For example, the offer rate was about 1% at a score of 22 and about 8% at 26, then about 30% at 32 and 62.5% at 36 (although only 16 applicants scored 36). This is why, if you are already scoring in the high 20s, every extra mark you can gain through practice is well worth the effort.
Check your own score
Use the slider to set the Section A score you expect to achieve. The calculator shows the offer rate at that score in the 2025-entry data.[1] Note that this is the rate for everyone who scored the same as you, whatever their GCSEs, essay and interview, so treat it as a rough guide and not as a prediction.
29
17.7%
Offer rate at this score, 2025 entry
In the offer-holder range. At these scores the LNAT is no longer holding you back, and the outcome depends mainly on your cGCSE score and the interview.
Where do my grades fit in?
For candidates with a cGCSE score, the 2025-26 shortlisting rank weighted the cGCSE score at 80%, Section A at 10% and the essay at 10%.[12] For these candidates the cGCSE score made up most of the rank, and the LNAT mainly separated candidates whose cGCSE scores were similar. Candidates without a cGCSE score were ranked on the two LNAT scores alone. We explain the rank in full in the next chapter.
In Section B you choose one of three questions and write an essay in 40 minutes. The LNAT recommends 500 to 600 words, with a maximum of 750.[17] The questions are deliberately broad (public policy, ethical dilemmas, contestable claims), so you do not need any specialist knowledge. We recommend choosing the question you can argue most clearly, even if another topic interests you more.
Note that the test centre does not mark the essay. Oxford marks it centrally using a system called No More Marking,[12] which works by comparative marking: essays are compared with one another to produce a ranking, and each essay is then given a score that reflects its place in that ranking.[4] The Faculty's 2021 admissions report describes the essay as scored from 1 to 100.[18]
What does Oxford look for in an essay?
In 2021, in reply to an FOI request, Oxford set out the features that distinguish essays ranked highly from those ranked lower.[4] Both lists below are quoted directly from that reply:
High-mark features
Application: close attention to the question(s) asked and sustained and focussed treatment of the issues.
Reasoning ability: well-drawn distinctions, a keen eye for relevance, awareness of more than one possible line of argument, and an element of independent critical judgment.
Communication: clear and fluent writing and notable clarity and appropriateness of structure and argument.
Low-mark features
Application: poor attention to the question(s) asked, no sustained and focussed treatment of the issues.
Reasoning ability: poorly developed arguments, a preponderance of irrelevant points, few or no well-drawn distinctions, a lack of awareness of more than one possible line of argument, no evidence of independent critical judgment.
Communication: lack of fluency and clarity and no clear or appropriate structure or argument.
It is worth reading the two lists side by side. Both mention independent critical judgment: high-mark essays show "an element of" it, while low-mark essays show "no evidence of" it.[4] In practice, this means your essay should take a position and defend it. An essay that only sets out the usual arguments on each side is unlikely to be ranked highly, however clearly it is written.
How do essay scores compare?
Essay scores are bunched far more tightly than Section A scores. In the 2025-entry data, Section A scores ran from 7 to 41, but all 1,766 essay scores fell between 50 and 75, and about 68% of applicants scored between 60 and 65.[1] The most common score was 64 (246 applicants).
Essay scores, 2025 entry
Very few essays reach either end of the range. About 1.5% of applicants scored 70 or more, and only 2% scored below 55.[1]
Why are the scores so close together?
Under No More Marking, markers compare two anonymised essays at a time and decide which is better.[10] Many such comparisons together produce a ranking, and each essay is given a score that reflects its place in it.[4] The Faculty's published reports do not explain how the ranking becomes a score, but its Law Admissions Manual for the 2024-25 round, released under FOI, does. Markers no longer give essays raw scores. Instead, the essays are placed on what the manual calls "the Oxford scale", which it expects to run from about 50 to 75.[27] This is why so few essays fall outside that range. According to the manual, the markers are nominated by the colleges and are graduate students or above.[27]
What does this mean for your preparation? Because so many essays score between 60 and 65, a modest improvement in clarity or structure can move your essay past a large number of others. If your practice essays are being marked in the 55 to 60 range, the problem is usually the structure of the argument, and we recommend working on that before you work on vocabulary.
Do the essay and Section A test the same thing?
The two sections overlap, but they test different skills. A candidate who writes a strong essay will not necessarily score well in Section A, and the reverse is also true. Section A tests careful reading and inference under time pressure, while the essay tests whether you can argue for a position within a clear structure.
At Oxford the essay counts for as much as Section A: each made up 10% of the 2025-26 shortlisting rank for candidates with a cGCSE score.[12] In that round, offer holders averaged 65.21 on the essay against 62.38 for all applicants, a gap of 2.83 points.[12] Since most essays score between 60 and 65, a gap of nearly three points is large, and we therefore recommend giving the essay as much practice time as Section A.
Sources cited on this page
Every numerical claim above ends in a [n] superscript that links here. Each link opens the FOI request on WhatDoTheyKnow, the Faculty's published report, or the official page.
Report on the 2025-26 round, for 2026 entry. First publication of the 80%/10%/10% (cGCSE/MCT/essay) shortlisting weighting. Without-cGCSE 50/50 fallback. Spreadsheet-of-strong-candidates rescue mechanism. LNAT averages for all 2,115 candidates, those shortlisted and those offered a place. Essays marked internally using No More Marking.
Per-applicant Section A score, essay score and offer outcome for 1,814 applicants to Law (M100) in the 2025 UCAS cycle (entry in 2025 or deferred entry in 2026); 1,767 have a Section A score and 235 received an offer. Law with Law Studies in Europe is not included. Averages by college are on separate sheets.
Reply of 28 September 2021 from Oxford's Information Compliance Team: essays are marked by comparative marking, which produces a ranking that scores are then assigned to reflect, and the reply lists the features of essays ranked highest and of essays ranked lower.
Section A: 42 multiple-choice questions on 12 passages in 95 minutes. Section B: one essay from three questions in 40 minutes. The mark out of 42 and the unmarked essay are on lnat.ac.uk/what-is-lnat/, the rule that nothing is deducted for wrong answers on lnat.ac.uk/how-to-prepare/hints-and-tips/, and the essay length guidance on lnat.ac.uk/how-to-prepare/sample-essays/.
Describes No More Marking as a comparison marking system in which markers compare two anonymised essays at a time and the system produces a numerical score.
Response of 23 December 2025. Law (M100) only, UCAS cycles 2023 to 2025: applications, shortlisting and offers by domicile; offer holders' LNAT scores (minimum, maximum, mean, quartiles); average first- and second-college interview scores; offer holders' A-level bands and GCSE profiles.
Response of 10 February 2026. Average Section A and essay scores for applicants (by college applied to) and offer holders (by college making the offer), UCAS cycles 2024 to 2026. Averages for groups below five are redacted.
Response of 30 July 2025. The Faculty's 57-page manual for the 2024-25 round (2025 entry), with the contextual-data and shortlisting-rule annexes redacted. Covers shortlisting (2.0 plus 0.5 candidates per place), the reasons a rank may not be representative, reasons for rejection before interview, the 1-5 interview scale, second interviews and essay marking by comparative judgement. One older annex still describes the essay as a choice of five questions passed unmarked to tutors; the rest of the manual and the Faculty reports describe central marking.
Response of 23 November 2023. Law (M100) applicants' Section A and essay scores for the 2023 cycle: Section A mean 24.32 (quartiles 21, 25 and 28); essay mean 62.88, from 50 to 75.
Response of 24 November 2023. Law (M100), 2022 cycle: Section A mean 22.75 for all applicants, 27.26 for those shortlisted and 28.34 for offer holders; essay means 61.62, 63.65 and 64.24.
Response of 13 November 2023. Law (M100), 2023 cycle: LNAT scores, first-college interview scores and outcomes for the 582 interviewed candidates, of whom 212 received offers.